The Pathological Protagonist of Dostoevsky’s Notes from...

The Pathological Protagonist of Dostoevsky’s Notes from the Underground Dostoevsky’s vision of the world is violent and his characters tortured; it is no wonder that many have viewed his work as prophetic of the 20th century. However, though Dostoevsky, in his unflinching portrayal of depravity, gives the Devil some of his best arguments, the Gospel often triumphs. Ivan Karamazov is at least offered the possibility of repentance when kissed by his saintly brother Alyosha. Raskolnikov, the nihilistic antihero of Crime and Punishment, is eventually redeemed through the love of the pure prostitute Sonja. Notes from the Underground, however, breaks this pattern. The protagonist of this novel, who, uncharacteristically for Dostoevsky,†¦show more content†¦Notes from the Underground, despite its unpolished narrative and paradoxical narrator, is a coherent whole, a subtle portrait of a man in conflict with himself. The first portion of the Notes is â€Å"a revelation of personality,† according to J. M. Coetzee, whereas the second is â€Å"a revelation of a shameful history† (219). The two cannot be separated from each other; both are necessary to complete the underground man’s portrait. Though he may put on a bold front in the ideological jabs of the first section, the second shows his ineffectual character, the seemingly irresolvable paradoxes of his personality. The underground man is paralyzed by indecision, governed by spite. His inability to â€Å"live life† is a malady that has grown prevalent in the â€Å"educated nineteenth century† (Dostoevsky 296, 191). As Dostoevsky writes in a footnote at the beginning of the work, â€Å"such persons as the writer of these notes not only may, but positively must, exist in our society, when we consider the circumstances under our society was formed† (179). The true philosophical lessons of the Notes are implicit, hidden within the narrative, and condemn the underground man as much as they do his rationalist opponents. Any satisfactory analysis of Notes from the Underground must keep in mind the singular consciousness and

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt And The National Labor...

In 1776, this great nation, the United States of America was created by Congress through its hopes of an independent nation. In the last two hundred plus years, we have accumulated forty-four presidents. Our longest serving president was Franklin Delano Roosevelt. He a served a consecutive three terms and was re-elected for a fourth term but sadly he died two months in(AE). FDR was a dominant leader in the democratic party and had lead the country through economic depression and all-out war. In the twelves years he had served he had created many important legislations, such as the Securities Exchange Act and the National Labor Relations Act(AE). FDR was inaugurated for his first term on March 4, 1933. At this time, the U.S was at its†¦show more content†¦The most popular of the New Deal agencies was the Civilian Conservation Corp(Home), this hired 250,000 unemployed men to work on local rural projects(AE). Congress also produced mortgage relief for millions of farmer and homeowners around the same time. FDR made agricultural relief a top priority and created the Agricultural Adjustment Administration(AE), forcing higher prices for items by paying these farmer to take land out of crops and to cut herds. In 1933 the National Industrial Recovery Act was created in order to reform the economy. It forced industries to establish rules of operations for all firms within specific industries(Gilder), minimum prices, agreements not to compete, and production restrictions. These industries also needed to raise wages. Provisions inspired unions and suspended anti-trust laws. The same year major new banking regulations were passed and in 1934(AE), the Securities and Exchange Commission was instituted to control Wall Street(Home). Roosevelt pursued recovery through federal spending, the NIRA spent $3.3 billion on the Public Works Administration to stimulate the economy(AE). He also worked with Republican senator George Norris to create the biggest government-owned industrial enterprise in American history, the Tennessee Valley Authority(Gilder). The TVA built dams and power stations, kept floods under control, and modernized agriculture and homes in the poverty engulfed Tennessee

The main aim is not to be afraid of yourself Free Essays

Several months ago I participated at training â€Å"Effective communication†. Actually, I didn’t think it will be useful for me, because I wasn’t a shy person, who doesn’t know what he wants from life. I didn’t have some special problems in personal relationships and in communications with my friends/teachers/family/etc. We will write a custom essay sample on The main aim is not to be afraid of yourself or any similar topic only for you Order Now Still, my friend invited me to visit this training and I agreed. Let it be, – I thought, – maybe I’ll find something interesting there, – who knows. To tell the truth, it was very useful for me and I’ve learned a lot of interesting things about myself which helped me to communicate with other people more effective. After that training I understood that if I remain myself (if I’m not changing myself) I’ll be happy and I’ll always be able to find way out from any difficult situation. The main aim is not to be afraid of yourself, to love and to accept yourself as you are. Unexpectedly for me I found out that I always was unsure in my actions, I was self-confident but only to some extent and very often after I took some decision; I tried to think over, what could happen if I acted in another way. I mean that I learned to look at my problems in simpler way, and then after I realized that actually I don’t have any problems. I understood that when the person is â€Å"opened†, people like him and they strive after him. You don’t need to be afraid and to hide your feelings, and then people start to understand you. Some of my fears from childhood disappeared; now in many cases I can control my aggression towards the other people. I was able to determine aim in my life, my internal state of mind changed into more vivid and confident. Communication with other people became more opened; I started to control my feelings. I learned that everything in my life depends on me, not on somebody else. That there are a lot of great possibilities, I only have to open my eyes and to reach them. Before I was loosing confidence in stress situations, and now I’m able to control my feelings. We made different kinds of tests and I understood that I like to clash with my friends and that I don’t show to people, who are close to me, feelings expressing my good attitude to them. I received practical knowledge in the field of understanding of human emotions and problems; I learned a lot of facts about myself with help of self-analysis and from opinions of other people. It was the unique experience for me and it helped me greatly in my life.    How to cite The main aim is not to be afraid of yourself, Papers

Interpersonal Communication free essay sample

Interpersonal communication is typically a dyadic (between two parties) form of communication. There are two major types of interpersonal communication used on a day to day basis: interpersonal (friends, family, partners), or impersonal (taxi drivers, shop assistants, etc. ). These can be utilised as an essential tool to enhance an individual’s ability in many facets: learning, relationships, professionally, socially and also helping others. Interpersonal communication is considered the most important form of communication and the most conventional. It is interdependent (mutually dependant) on visual (sight), auditory (sound), and kinetic (body language) stimuli. Firstly this essay will outline a brief history of interpersonal communication. Also in the following paragraphs, I will include examples of nonverbal (sight, sound and kinesis), verbal (face to face) and emotional intelligence (EI). I will also try to elaborate on some of the key aspects of effective (works well) and ineffective (does not work well) interpersonal communication. Since the beginning of time the inhabitant’s of this earth have been searching for suitable means of communication, and also a way to improve/cultivate the process. Relationships are at the heart of human behavior, building solid relationships can have a lifelong impact on our personal and moral development. Nonverbal communication is just as important as verbal communication and it can take many forms during its transmission, the process of nonverbal communication is accomplished through the sending and receiving of wordless messages. Language studies traditionally emphasize verbal and written communication but dismiss the importance of the silent language. It comes in many forms; it can be a person’s clothing, strut, facial expression, gestures, eye contact and tone of voice. To thoroughly understand some nonverbal communication one must also be versed in different cultures. There are many nonverbal differences across cultures that may be misleading or be a source of confusion. Research suggests that nonverbal communication is more important in understanding human behavior than spoken words. There are many universal emotions, such as fear, sadness, happiness etc. For me, I have problems to communicate to some people through interpersonal. I find it hard to communicate with my friends, family members, and strangers since I do not open completely myself to other people. Consequently, I do not have a long conversation with my friends or family members. The three problems that I have for interpersonal communication are self-disclosure, perception, and listening. First of all, I have a problem on self-disclosure because I don’t want to open myself. Our ability to communicate well with others is important to personal and professional success. As simple as communication seems, much of what we try to communicate to others—and what others try to communicate to us—gets misunderstood, which can cause conflict and frustration in personal and professional relationships. I think on both personal and professional level I am a moderate listener. I like to listen more than I talk. Sometimes I feel there’s nothing wrong with being quiet but at times really painful to not be able to say what I want to say, or not to be able to speak up ever. I believe only way to improve from this is keep trying and keep putting myself in positions where I have to speak and I guess it will be easier. I have to practice talking to my friends more often, or trying to dominant conversations for a while. Maybe I have to try putting myself in social situations where I am *slightly* uncomfortable – I’ll feel horrible and probably make an idiot of myself a few times; talking to people I dont usually talk to or accepting an invitation to somewhere I usually dont go. To strengthen my skills I guess I have to just expand my interests and hobbies so that I have a broader scope of topics to choose from when I communicate with others. Another thing that could do to improve my communication skills would be ‘asking question’ as much as possible. I think when I’ll be asking question they will feel like they are connecting with me and at the same time I will learn a lot more about the person so you may be able to contribute as well. Listening is an important skill that involves a lot more than the actual physical process of hearing. Possessing good listening skills is critical to success in a career, in relationships, and life itself. Without the ability to listen well, an individual is prone to making mistakes, wasting time, and frequently misunderstanding the messages of others. Practice can improve a person’s listening skills. First, I need to understand that listening is an active, rather than passive, process. Not only must I hear what a speaker says, I must understand it and then judge whether the information make sense. To improve my listening skills, I think I have to listen with respect to improve my listening skills. Use my tone of voice and choice of words to communicate that I am genuinely trying to understand what the person is saying. Providing my full attention on the person speaking; I should try not to get distracted by other sights or sounds. I should use more eye contact to remain focused. I should be trying to tune out any mannerisms of the speaker that may divert my attention from the content. I should always focus my mind on what is being said to improve my listening skills; try adjusting my body position if I find myself losing concentration. In a conflict, most of us primarily want to feel heard and understood. We talk a lot about our point of view to get the other person to see things our way. Ironically, if we all do this all the time, there’s little focus on the other person’s point of view, and nobody feels understood. We have to put ourselves in other’s shoes and try to see the situation from the point of view of others who are involved. Others will more likely be willing to listen if they feel heard. For people around me to communicate effectively I use my hands, facial expressions and eyes very often, usually observant and focusing on others eyes while we talk, as well as, their gestures and body language. But I have worked on not being touchy, as I used to have a tendency to put my arm around people or touch their arms or shoulders while talking with them. As far as actual conversation goes, I am focused, but sometimes get caught up in details. Receptive, but sometimes overanalyze things. I have an inquisitive nature, but sometimes come across as too curious, and am mindful of that. Sometimes I like having conversation with people of different cultures, because it gives me a chance to learn more about their lifestyle. Good communication passes information along. If we can effectively communicate, then people understand us much better, and whatever information we are trying to tell them will get across without being misunderstood. Communication makes good relationships. If we can effectively communicate, then other people know what we need and want, and we can let them know our feelings without being misunderstood. This prevents all that mind-reading arguments. If we can explain our thoughts and feelings, then we wont misunderstand each other. Good communications give us self-esteem. People with effective communication skills are more confident, because they know that they can tell other people exactly what they need to, and they know that they understand those people better. It helps us to think better. In order to communicate effectively, we have to think ahead and organize our thoughts. This helps us learn how to organize, and how to plan ahead. If we can communicate well, we can decide whether or not we have understood what the teacher just said, and can then let the teacher know whether or not we need additional help. Communication skills are incredibly important, not only to students, but to everyone. Verbal communication is a large part of how we present ourselves, and so having the appropriate skill set is beneficial in both our private and public lives. If someone is unable to communicate well, it does not matter how brilliant or talented they are. They will not be able to live up to their full potential if they cannot present themselves well and adequately express their ideas. Communication skill is very essential because it usually makes or breaks our career. In work, communication skill is very important since we need to communicate with others and we need to deliver and get the right message. Because if we cant communicate effectively, people wont listen to what we have to say and we will have very limited career options. But we also shouldn’t forget about nonverbal communication. It is as important as verbal. It’s like two sides of a coin.

Cross Cultural Management for Work Team- myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theCross Cultural Management for Work Team. Answer: Introduction Cross cultural management defines the management of work team, which incorporates varying culture, preferences and practices of international business context (DesAutels et al., 2015). The study will discuss the cultural differences to be faced by a business person of Nepal, while he will be communicating and negotiating effectively in the business culture of Saudi Arabia. Apart from that, the study will also discuss the challenges faced the business person in cross cultural communication. Furthermore, the study will also prove some suitable recommendation to the business person towards effectively communication and negotiating in the business culture of Saudi Arabia. Cultural Differences between Nepal and Saudi Arabia The key culture differences between Nepal and Saudi Arabia can be clearly identified through Hofstede'scultural dimension theory and high and low context differences. This theory will explore the cultural differences between two countries which are most relevant for communication and negotiation. Power Distance Index Power distance index defines the extent to which less powerful employees of an organization accept or expect that organizational power is distributed unequally. While considering the business culture of Nepal, it can be found that the organization power in distributed equally among the organizational members. An equal distribution of organizational power can be seen among the organizational members of Nepal. On the other hand, Habbash and Habbash, (2016) opined that Saudi Arabia has high power distance index, where organizational power is unequally distributed among the organizational members. Low powerful organizational members are to accept the power of high powerful organizational members. Individualism VS collectivism Individualism VS collectivism dimension defines the degree to which the organizational members are integrated in a group (Khakhar Rammal, 2013). Individualistic society has loose ties, where the people are mostly prefer individualism manner. On the other hand, collectivist society has tightly integrated relationship among the people. According to Chibba, (2015), the organizations Nepal mostly follow collectivism cultural dimension. Moreover, the organizational members prefer to be in a group and their strength remains in group work. On the other hand, Salem, (2014) opined that the organizational in Saudi Arabia prefer individualist culture. In such culture, the organizational members mostly prefer to be in individualism manner. Therefore, group work is not much appreciated in the business culture of Saudi Arabia. Uncertainty Avoidance Index Uncertainty Avoidance Index dimension defined the degree of tolerance of the people in a society. Moreover, it assesses the degree to which the people in a particular society embrace or advert something that is unknown, unexpected or far away from the current status quo (Chibba, 2015). The organizations having high degree in this dimension opt for stiff code of behavior, guidelines, laws and absolute truth. On the other hand, organizations having low degree in this dimension are willing to accept innovative ideas, concepts and they are less imposed by stiff business guidelines. According to Shrestha, (2017), the organizations in Nepal are always willing to accept new business ideas and concepts for creating business innovation. Moreover, the organizational members are highly communicative with new people for having innovative business ideas. On the other hand, Jackson and Manderscheid, (2015) opined that the organizations of Saudi Arabia are having stiff code of rules and business gu idelines. They are not open up to new business thoughts and the organizational members are not flexible in communicating with new people. Masculinity and Femininity This dimension defines the preference of an organization towards achievement, heroism, material rewards and assertiveness. Organizations having masculinity culture have more preferences for modesty, quality of life and care for weak (Beugelsdijk et al., 2017). Women are not given much priority in such business culture. On the other hand, organizations having femininity culture are highly empathetic and have equal preference for both males and females. According to Poudel, (2017), the business culture in Nepal is highly feminine, where the female organizational members are given equal priority like their male counterparts. On the other hand, Welsh et al., (2014) opined that the business culture in Saudi Arabia is highly masculine, where female organizational members are not given much priority in business meetings and other business context. Long-Term Orientation vs. Short-Term Orientation This dimension explores the connection of past occurrence with the present and future actions. Organizations having low index in this dimension prefer traditional business concepts. However, organizations having high index in this dimension prefer adaption, circumstantial and adopt changes with dynamic business environment. According to Simkhada et al., (2013), the organizations in Nepal are highly adaptive and circumstantial. On the other hand, Khakhar and Rammal (2013) opined that organizations in Saudi Arabia are restricted to traditional business concepts. Indulgence vs. Restraint According to Gautam, (2015), the people in Nepal are always restraint and they control their gratification of needs by strict social norms. On the other hand, Aldraehim et al., (2013) opined that the people of Saudi Arabia are highly indulgent and prefer to enjoy life with full of fun. High and Low Context Differences This dimension refers to the degree of direct and indirect communication a particular culture uses in their internal dialogue. According to Shrestha, (2017), the business culture in Saudi Arabia is having high degree in this dimension, where the speakers relies on the receivers to have certain degree of pre-existing knowledge about the discussed business topic. On the other hand, Jackson and Manderscheid, (2015) opined that business entrepreneurs of Nepal clearly transmit precise and transparent message in the business meetings and negotiation process. Cross-Cultural Communication and Negotiation Analysis for Identifying Challenges Communication Issue The business person from Nepal can face huge problems in Saudi Arabia in regards to business communication. According to Simkhada et al., (2013), the main language of Nepal is Nepali, whereas, the main language of Saudi Arabia is Arabic. Therefore, the business person will face language issue in Saudi Arabia during the communication and negotiation process. On the other hand, Welsh et al., (2014) opined that the business entrepreneurs are highly assertive in their communication style. They mostly use high tone in their speech during business negotiation process. However, the business entrepreneurs of Nepal are not much accustomed with assertive tone in verbal communication. Therefore, the business person from Nepal can face high communication issue in business negotiation in Saudi Arabia. Challenges in Decision Making of Negotiation The business person from Nepal can face huge challenge in terms of making decisions in business negotiation. According to Gautam, (2015), the business persons in Saudi Arabia are highly stiff to the traditional rules and business ideas. They are not much reliant upon new and innovative business decisions. On the other hand, Habbash and Habbash, (2016) opined that the business persons are highly inclined towards adapting innovative business decision towards getting business success in dynamic business environment. In such situation, the business person from Nepal may face issues in decision making during the negotiation process with the business persons of Saudi Arabia. Conflicting Attitude towards Disclosure The business person from Nepal can face tough challenges in terms of conflicting attitude towards disclosure. According to Aldraehim et al., (2013), the business culture of Nepal is feminie, where the emotion of the people are considered oftentimes even in business negotiation. On the other hand, Salem, (2014) opined that the business culture of Saudi Arabia is highly masculine, where emotion is not considered during business negotiation process. They are only reliant on statistical fact for believing on the business process. Therefore, such strict mentality of the business person in Saudi Arabia may create problems for the business person from Nepal. Challenges in Building Trust The business person from Nepal may face huge issues in building trust with the business persons of Saudi Arabia. According to Chibba, (2015), the business persons from Nepal are quite flexible in making good relationship with new people and adopting new business ideas. However, DesAutels et al., (2015) opined that the business persons of Saudi Arabia are not much communicative with the new people and reluctant to trust on new persons. In such situation, the business person from Nepal will face tough challenges in building trusting relationship with the business persons of Saudi Arabia. It will ultimately hamper the communication and business negotiation process of the business person in Saudi Arabia. Challenges in Completing Tasks after Negotiation The business person from Nepal can also face tough challenges in completing the tasks during and after the negotiation process. According to Poudel, (2017), the business persons in Nepal are having low context in their business communication. Moreover, they communicate clear and precise information among all the organizational members, which speed up the competition of organizational tasks. On the other hand, Jackson and Manderscheid, (2015) opined that the business persons in Saudi Arabia are high context in business communication. Moreover, they share little information with the organizational information, which can mislead the actual business goals and delay the success of the negotiation process and ultimate business. Recommendation Cross Cultural Understanding The business person from Nepal should enhance his cultural understanding regarding the people of Saudi Arabia. The business person should first learn Arabic language for effectively communicating with the business persons of Saudi Arabia. Apart from that, the business person should also be aware of the values and norms of the people in Saudi Arabia. It will also help the business person in understanding the non verbal communication of the business persons in Saudi Arabia. Active Listening It is suggested for the business person from Nepal to actively listen to the business persons of Saudi Arabia. In this way, the business person from Nepal will better understand the business perspectives and business terms of Saudi Arabias business persons. Active listening will help both parties in the negotiation process to come an agree point quickly for successful business negotiation. Using Statistical Data in Business Negotiation From the cultural differences, it has been found that the business persons of Saudi Arabia are more reliant on statistical data of business rather than any emotional factor. Therefore, the business person from Nepal should always focus on the statistical data of business process during the negotiation process. It will help in developing high level of trust between both the parties. Using Diplomatic Attitude in Business Negotiation During the negotiation process, the business person should demonstrate diplomatic attitude over any cultural clash. Moreover, cultural clash is more likely to happen in differing business culture, which can even lead to cultural conflict in the business communication and negotiation process. Therefore, the business person from Nepal should demonstrate diplomatic attitude in cultural conflict even show more respect to the culture of Saudi Arabia. It will minimize the chance of cultural clash and lead to successful business negotiation. Conclusion While concluding the study, it can be said that the business culture of Nepal prefer group work, whereas the business culture of Saudi Arabia prefer individualism. Furthermore, the business persons of Nepal are open up to new business ideas and concepts. However, the business persons of Saudi Arabia prefer traditional business ideas. Therefore, the business person from Nepal can face decision making problems in Saudi Arabia. The business persons of Saudi Arabia are not much reliant on new business persons. Therefore, the business persons from Nepal can face huge issues in terms of building trustable relationship with the business persons of Saudi Arabia. Therefore, the business person from Nepal should enhance the cultural understanding about Saudi Arabia towards having effective business communication and negotiation. References Aldraehim, M., Edwards, S. L., Watson, J. A., Chan, T. (2013). Cultural impact on e-service use in Saudi Arabia: the need for interaction with other humans.International Journal of Advanced Computer Science,3(2). Beugelsdijk, S., Kostova, T., Roth, K. (2017). An overview of Hofstede-inspired country-level culture research in international business since 2006.Journal of International Business Studies,48(1), 30-47. Chibba, M. (2015). Contemporary perspectives on international business and culture.International Journal of Business and Globalisation,14(4), 408-419. DesAutels, P., Berthon, P., Caruana, A., Pitt, L. F. (2015). The impact of country connectedness and cultural values on the equity of a countrys workforce: A cross-country investigation.Cross Cultural Management,22(1), 2-20. Gautam, D. K. (2015). Strategic Human Resource Development: Shifting Paradigm in Nepalese Listed Companies.SDMIMD Journal of Management,6(2), 1-8. Habbash, M., Habbash, M. (2016). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from Saudi Arabia.Social Responsibility Journal,12(4), 740-754. Jackson, D., Manderscheid, S. V. (2015). A phenomenological study of Western expatriates adjustment to Saudi Arabia.Human Resource Development International,18(2), 131-152. Khakhar, P., Rammal, H. G. (2013). Culture and business networks: International business negotiations with Arab managers.International Business Review,22(3), 578-590. Poudel, J. (2017). Socio-Cultural Impact in Tourism: A Case Study of Sauraha, Nepal.Journal of Advanced Academic Research,1(2), 47-55. Salem, M. I. (2014). The role of business incubators in the economic development of Saudi Arabia.The International Business Economics Research Journal (Online),13(4), 853. Shrestha, B. K. (2017). Religious Ethics and Socially Responsible Behaviors of Small Firms in Nepal.Journal of Religion and Business Ethics,3(2), 5. Simkhada, P. P., Shyangdan, D., van Teijlingen, E. R., Kadel, S., Stephen, J., Gurung, T. (2013). Womens knowledge of and attitude towards disability in rural Nepal.Disability and rehabilitation,35(7), 606-613. Welsh, D. H., Memili, E., Kaciak, E., Al Sadoon, A. (2014). Saudi women entrepreneurs: A growing economic segment.Journal of Business Research,67(5), 758-762.

Hamlet And Ophelia Essays (608 words) - Characters In Hamlet

Hamlet And Ophelia Ophelia is a beautiful and simple-minded woman, easily molded by the more powerful opinions and desires of others. The thoughts of her father and her brother influenced her the most. The love letters from Hamlet also swayed her opinions and confused her mind. Ophelia wasn't able to realize herself because of all the pressures exerted on her to be something she's not. That weakness of mind and will, which permitted her obedience to her father and thus destroyed her hope for Hamlet's love, finally resulted in her insanity and death. When her father had challenged the honor of Hamlet's intentions, Ophelia could only reply "I do not know, my lord, what I should think" (III, iii). Used to relying upon her father's direction and brought up to be obedient, she can only accept her father's belief, seconded by that of her brother, that Hamlet's "holy vows" of love were simply designed for her seduction. She was to obey her father's orders not to permit Hamlet to see her again. Her father also wanted to prove Hamlet's madness to the king. He used Ophelia as bait so he and the king could listen to Hamlet's words. Ophelia willingly obliged to her father's desires. By not thinking for herself and only doing as her father wished, she ruined her chances of love with Hamlet. Hamlet put pressure on Ophelia by expecting her to surpass his mother's shortcomings and be an epitome of womankind. He searched her innocent face for some sign of loving truth that might restore his faith in her. He took her mute terror for a sign of her guilt and found her to be a false person, like his mother. In his letter to her, he addressed the letter to "the most beautified Ophelia" and he terminated the letter with "I love thee best, O most best, believe it" (II, ii). He used the word "beautified" to display a sincere tribute, and it is apparent he still loves her. His attempts to win her affection are not triumphant. Ophelia is still too much under the influence of her father to question his wisdom or authority, and she has no mind of her own to understand how much she has made her lover suffer. No matter how much it pained her to not see Hamlet, all she could see in his present behavior is the madness that terrified her. Ophelia's insanity was a mixture of love and hate caused by her father and Hamlet. An example of hate is when she sings about a "baker's daughter"(IV, v). Ophelia is referring to the way her father used to treat her before the tragic incident of his death. The love within her madness is when she speaks about the events on "Valentine's Day"(IV, v). When Ophelia speaks about Valentines Day she is referring to the events of romance that she was denied. Ophelia's madness is brought on by her lack of being able to demonstrate any maturity in trying to cope with her losses and in return can only inflict her madness on the court. Abused by her lover, and bereft of her father's protection she loses control of her mind. In her insane state she came to believe that the seduction her family tried so hard to protect her from has passed. Her father's admission of error might have embittered a more independent Ophelia. This explains Hamlets rejection of her. Being tormented of scenes of death and the burial, she reaches out to the beauty of hanging flowers in a willow tree and somehow drowns. Ophelia was never able to understand exactly what Hamlet was suffering from, and in a way he created a situation for her to relate; death of a father and betrayal by a loved one. Hamlet managed to rise above insanity and feelings of suicide, but her weaker spirit could not hold the burden.

1 Berkey Research Paper

1 Berkey Research Paper 1 Berkey Research Paper Berkey 1 Kirsten Berkey Mrs. Stoltz English 9 AT/H  ­ 1 9 March 2015 Legal Drinking Age: Continuing the Legacy Every year, nine hundred adolescents below the age of twenty ­one would be buried because of traffic ­related accidents as a result of a lower drinking age at eighteen (â€Å"The Debate†). Young adults are just beginning their lives with so much potential for the future. A lower drinking age heightens the potential for young people to destroy their future opportunities. Lately, contrasting views on changing the minimum legal drinking age to eighteen have erupted into the news. Individuals feel the current legal drinking age is outdated because eighteen year ­olds receive all their rights except the right to drink. They also believe a lower drinking age would help young adults drink more responsibly and in a controlled setting. Others view the current law as a safety net to prevent the amount of deaths that are the result of alcohol use or abuse. Changing the legal drinking age to eighteen is not an option because of the effects of alcohol on brain development, alcohol ­related problems in the future for individuals who use alcohol at a younger age, and a higher amount of fatalities on the highway. A lower drinking age disrupts brain development in adolescents and young adults that has detrimental effects on brain functionality as a lifelong result. Researchers have come to the conclusion that excessive alcohol use can disrupt the growth of new brain cells or neurons that grow until adulthood in a process called neurogenesis (â€Å"Alcohol’s†). Resulting in the extended loss found in necessary regions inside the brain ­including the hippocampal function and structure in late adolescence (â€Å"Alcohol’s†). This evidence signifies the destruction Berkey 2 associated with younger alcohol use which causes more brain damage that would disturb the growth process into adulthood. In addition, the effects of alcohol use can hinder an individual's brain tissues and hurt the part of the brain that controls memories, thinking and emotions leading to perpetual changes in the brain that can require life custodial care (Wagner 14, 42). Examples like these clearly show the consequences of alcohol altering the brain beyond repair. With the drinking age kept at twenty ­one, it decreases the chance for more damage to be done that is permanent. A higher drinking age protects altercations in the minds of intellectually thriving young people. Furthermore, lowering the drinking age does not teach young people to drink more responsibly and increases the chances of young adults to have alcohol ­related problems in the future . Compared to adolescents who waited until they were twenty ­one to drink, a study has been conducted that noticed eighteen year olds were nearly twice as likely as twenty ­one year olds to engage in a physical fight and be unintentionally injured after consuming alcohol (Kiesbye 15). This research demonstrates the fact that underage alcohol consumption has huge effects on the health and safety of an individual and community. Lowering the drinking age to eighteen causes a higher amount of potential risks for being injured. In addition, alcohol is a factor in twenty eight percent of college dropouts. By allowing the legal drinking age to eighteen, there is a possibility more young people would drop out of college ("Apecsec†). Varied individuals believe that lowering the drinking age to eighteen will teach teens to drink and act more responsibly with the use of alcohol. Statistics emphasize otherwise, as adolescents would make unwise decisions that could negatively affect their future career and lifestyle options with the ability to obtain alcohol. Naturally, a lower drinking age has no place in our society as it causes unnecessary risks for injuries and the possibility to negatively affect the consumer’s future affairs. Berkey 3 Most importantly, a lower drinking age